ID |
Date |
Author |
Type |
Category |
Subject |
Project |
|
17
|
Sat Mar 18 17:05:09 2017 |
Amy Connolly | Write-ups | Analysis | Effect of Phase Center Offsets in LCP/RCP Correlation Maps | ANITA |
This is a writeup I worked on last Fall, arguing that even if we have phase center offsets between H and V, our L and R maps should still show a good reconstruction. |
| Attachment 1: LR.pdf
|
| Attachment 2: LR.tex
|
\documentclass[11pt]{article}
\usepackage{graphicx}
\usepackage{epstopdf}
\usepackage{mathrsfs}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{subfigure}
\usepackage{wrapfig}
%\usepackage{mlineno}
%\usepackage{color}
\setlength{\textwidth}{16.58cm}
\setlength{\textheight}{22.94cm}
\setlength{\headheight}{0pt}
\setlength{\headsep}{0pt}
\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-0.04cm}
\setlength{\topmargin}{-0.04cm}
\renewcommand{\baselinestretch}{1.0}
\includeonly{}
\usepackage{indentfirst}
\usepackage{url}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{cite}
%\usepackage[square, comma, sort&compress]{natbib}
\begin{document}
\begin{center}
{\Large
Effect of Phase Center Offsets in LCP/RCP Correlation Maps
}
~\\
~\\
\end{center}
\section{Defining H/V/LCP/RCP Waveforms}
Waveform in the vertical polarization. The $n$ index represents antenna number and the $i$ index is for time bin.
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:vwaveform}
v_n(t_i) = \sum_k e^{-j \omega_k t_i} V(\omega_k) \Delta \omega
\end{equation}
Now horizontal polarization, giving all of the H-pol phase centers a time offset relative to the V-pol phase centers.
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:hwaveform}
h_n(t_i) = \sum_k e^{-j \left( \omega_k t_i + \omega_k t_0 \right) } H(\omega_k) \Delta \omega
\end{equation}
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:rwaveform}
r_n(t_i) = \dfrac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \left[ v(t_i) + j h(t_i) \right]
\end{equation}
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:lwaveform}
\ell_n(t_i) = \dfrac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \left[ v(t_i) - j h(t_i) \right]
\end{equation}
Substituting Eqs.~\ref{eq:vwaveform} and ~\ref{eq:hwaveform} into Eqs. ~\ref{eq:rwaveform} and ~\ref{eq:lwaveform}:
\begin{equation}
r_n(t_i) = \dfrac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \sum_k \Delta \omega e^{-j \omega_kt_i} \left[ V(\omega_k) + j e^{-j\omega_k t_0} H(\omega_k) \right]
\end{equation}
\section{Cross-Correlations with LCP/RCP Waveforms}
Now consider two antennas, and antenna 1 has a delay $T$ with respect to 2. Then,
\begin{equation}
r_1(t_i) = \dfrac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \sum_k \Delta \omega e^{-j \omega_k t_i} \left[ V(\omega_k) + j e^{-j\omega_k t_0} H(\omega_k) \right]
\end{equation}
And since
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:vwaveform}
v_2(t_i) = \sum_k e^{-j \omega_k (t_i+T)} V(\omega_k) \Delta \omega
\end{equation}
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:hwaveform}
h_2(t_i) = \sum_k e^{-j \left[ \omega_k (t_i+t_0+T) \right] } H(\omega_k) \Delta \omega
\end{equation}
then
\begin{equation}
r_2(t_i) = \dfrac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \sum_k \Delta \omega e^{-j \omega_k (t_i+T)} \left[ V(\omega_k) + j e^{-j\omega_k t_0} H(\omega_k) \right]
\end{equation}
Cross-correlating the RCP waveforms from antennas 1 and 2 ($r_1$ and $r_2$), and ignoring the normalization factor in the denominator for now, the get the following as a function of delay $\tau$ between the two RCP waveforms:
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:C12rr}
C^{rr}_{12}(\tau) = \sum_{k^{\prime}} \Delta t ~ r_1(t_i) r^*_2 (t_i+\tau)
\end{equation}
where the sum is over the region where the waveforms overlap for a given $\tau$.
Then substituting $r_1(t_i)$ and $r_2(t_i+\tau)$ into Eq.~\ref{eq:C12rr},
\begin{multline}
C^{rr}_{12}(\tau) = \dfrac{1}{2} \left[ \sum_{k_1} \Delta \omega e^{-j \omega_{k_1} t_i} \left[ V(\omega_{k_1}) + j e^{-j\omega_{k_1} t_0} H(\omega_{k_1}) \right] \right] \times \\
\left[ \sum_{k_2} \Delta \omega e^{+j \omega_{k_2} (t_i+T+\tau)} \left[ V(\omega_{k_2}) + j e^{-j\omega_{k_2} t_0} H(\omega_{k_2}) \right] \right]
\end{multline}
Collecting terms, we get:
\begin{multline}
C^{rr}_{12}(\tau) = \sum_{k_1} \sum_{k_2} (\Delta \omega)^2 e^{-j\left[ \omega_{k_1} t_i-\omega_{k_2} (t_i+T+\tau) \right]} \times \\
\left[ V(\omega_{k_1} )V^* (\omega_{k_2}) -j e^{j \omega_{k_2} t_0 } V(\omega_{k_1} )H^*(\omega_{k_2}) +j e^{-j \omega_{k_1} t_0} H(\omega_{k_1}) V^* (\omega_{k_2}) +H(\omega_{k_1}) H^* (\omega_{k_2}) \right]
\end{multline}
Likewise the LCP waveforms for antennas 1 and 2, where again antenna 1 has a delay $T$ with respect to 2:
\begin{equation}
\ell_1(t_i) = \dfrac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \sum_k \Delta \omega e^{-j \omega_k t_i} \left[ V(\omega_k) - j e^{-j\omega_k t_0} H(\omega_k) \right]
\end{equation}
\begin{equation}
\ell_2(t_i) = \dfrac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \sum_k \Delta \omega e^{-j \omega_k (t_i+T)} \left[ V(\omega_k) - j e^{-j\omega_k t_0} H(\omega_k) \right]
\end{equation}
Then,
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:C12rr}
C^{\ell\ell}_{12}(\tau) = \sum_{k^{\prime}} \Delta t ~ \ell_1(t_i) \ell^*_2 (t_i+\tau)
\end{equation}
\begin{multline}
C^{\ell \ell}_{12}(\tau) = \sum_{k_1} \sum_{k_2} (\Delta \omega)^2 e^{-j\left[ \omega_{k_1} t_i-\omega_{k_2} (t_i+T+\tau) \right]} \times \\
\left[ V(\omega_{k_1} )V^* (\omega_{k_2}) +j e^{j \omega_{k_2} t_0 } V(\omega_{k_1} )H^*(\omega_{k_2}) -j e^{-j \omega_{k_1} t_0} H(\omega_{k_1}) V^* (\omega_{k_2}) +H(\omega_{k_1}) H^* (\omega_{k_2}) \right]
\end{multline}
\end{document}
|
|
16
|
Fri Mar 17 00:25:49 2017 |
Amy Connolly | Write-ups | Theory | Dependence of density of packed snow with depth | ARA |
I had a glaciology day and did my own derivation of rho(z) using the compressibility of packed snow. The conclusions are a bit different from what Jordan found, although similar and greater depths, so I'll be interested to hear what he thinks, or anyone else!
Attached are my writeup, and an interesting paper reporting measurements of compressibility of packed ice.
|
| Attachment 1: mycalc.pdf
|
| Attachment 2: a028622.pdf
|
|
15
|
Wed Mar 15 17:17:13 2017 |
J.C. Hanson | Refereed Papers | Theory | Latest Askaryan RF emission paper | ARA |
|
| Attachment 1: elsarticle-template.pdf
|
|
Draft
|
Wed Mar 15 17:16:22 2017 |
J.C. Hanson | Write-ups | Theory | | |
|
|
12
|
Tue Jan 24 14:52:26 2017 |
Brian Dailey | Thesis/Candidacy | Analysis | Re-Analysis of ANITA-2 with focus on Filtering Techniques | ANITA |
Brian Dailey's Ph. D. dissertation for ANITA-2. Defended on Decemeber 22, 2016. |
| Attachment 1: Brian_thesis.pdf
|
|
11
|
Tue Jan 24 09:13:11 2017 |
J.C. Hanson | Write-ups | Analysis | Latest Firn/Ice Work | |
see attached. |
| Attachment 1: NearSurface_IceReport.pdf
|
|
10
|
Mon Jan 23 19:49:31 2017 |
Jorge Torres | Write-ups | Simulation | Report | BuckArray |
Draft (Jan 21, 2017) |
| Attachment 1: Buckarray_report.pdf
|
|
9
|
Mon Jan 16 09:10:15 2017 |
J.C. Hanson | Write-ups | General | Dissertation of Kamlesh Dookayka (use for ShelfMC guide) | ARA |
See attached. |
| Attachment 1: Kamlesh_thesis_1_0.pdf
|
|
Draft
|
Thu Jan 12 15:39:56 2017 |
Brian Dailey | Write-ups | Analysis | ANITA-2 ReAnalysis with Focus of Filters | ANITA |
Brian Dailey's thesis |
|
7
|
Wed Jan 11 11:35:17 2017 |
Oindree Banerjee | Write-ups | General | PhD Candidacy Paper: High Energy Neutrinos from Gamma Ray Bursts: Theoretical Predictions, Experimental Searches, and Prospects for Detection | ANITA |
my candidacy paper |
| Attachment 1: Candidacy-Paper.pdf
|
|
6
|
Tue Jan 10 12:56:31 2017 |
J. C. Hanson | Refereed Papers | General | My Dissertation (read section 2.4 for an understanding of the non-observation of ray-tracing) | ARA |
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/8930310/pdf/HansonThesis.pdf |
|
Draft
|
Sun Dec 18 23:55:21 2016 |
Amy Connolly | Other | Other | Radio Detection of High Energy Neutrinos | Other |
|
|
3
|
Sun Dec 18 23:50:25 2016 |
Amy Connolly | Refereed Papers | Analysis | Constraints on the Ultra-High-Energy Neutrino Flux from Gamma-Ray Bursts from a Prototype Station of the Askaryan Radio Array | ARA |
|
| Attachment 1: elsarticle-template-num.pdf
|
|
2
|
Fri Dec 16 12:20:26 2016 |
J.C. Hanson | Refereed Papers | Analysis | Radio detection of air showers with the ARIANNA experiment on the Ross Ice Shelf | ARA |
J.C. Hanson - I'm adding this paper reference so we have something to shoot for in our own analyses searching for down-coming events: arXiv:1612.04473
|